More failed pro-choice rhetoric

Author: Ryft

May 30

So Tavarish published his “last reply” defending failed pro-choice rhetoric (at his blog ironically called The Usual Rhetoric), tackling my recent response to his five so-called counter-arguments against the pro-life stance. Since his arguments have not changed in any way, and my response already confronted them head-on, there is very little for me to add to this dialogue. This will be, then, a very brief summation.

Read the rest of this entry

  • Date: 30 May 2010
  • Categoriess: Marriage & Family > Sexuality
  • Tags: > > > >

    • Further response to pro-choice rhetoric

    Author: Ryft

    May 22

    In what is thus far the most commented article on this site, penned by our newest staff member Adam (see “How to respond to empty pro-choice rhetoric”), one of our regular visitors and a gentleman I enjoy talking with, Tavarish, recently posted five counter-arguments against the pro-life stance advocated by our staff writers. Not wishing for these issues to get archived deeper into the site as the article ages, I am addressing his five counter-arguments in a fresh article. And I am addressing each of them head-on, as he seems to suggest that no one has directly confronted them. For a full and proper context, please see the comments field to Adam’s article.

    Read the rest of this entry

  • Date: 22 May 2010
  • Categoriess: Marriage & Family > Sexuality
  • Tags: > > > >