Jamin Hubner, over at his Real Apologetics blog, highlighted a consistent weakness in classical apologetics (i.e., the evidentialist approach) by critically analyzing a rather astonishing concession Norman Geisler made in his Systematic Theology, a concession that exposes the stark reversal of theological priorities that the evidentialist approach commits itself to—i.e., the priority of natural revelation over special revelation. Please take a few minutes and read “The Classic Error of Classical Apologetics.” The article is not long, but it makes a very powerful point.
